Clinics in Perinatology
Volume 37, Issue 1 , Pages 141-165, March 2010

Random Safety Auditing, Root Cause Analysis, Failure Mode and Effects Analysis

  • Robert Ursprung, MD, MMSc

      Affiliations

    • Pediatrix Medical Group, Cook Children's Medical Center, Department of Neonatology, 801 Seventh Avenue, Fort Worth, TX 76104, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • James Gray, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Division of Newborn Medicine, Harvard Medical School, USA
    • Division of Clinical Informatics, Department of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA

Improving quality and safety in health care is a major concern for health care providers, the general public, and policy makers. Errors and quality issues are leading causes of morbidity and mortality across the health care industry. There is evidence that patients in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are at high risk for serious medical errors. To facilitate compliance with safe practices, many institutions have established quality-assurance monitoring procedures. Three techniques that have been found useful in the health care setting are failure mode and effects analysis, root cause analysis, and random safety auditing. When used together, these techniques are effective tools for system analysis and redesign focused on providing safe delivery of care in the complex NICU system.

Keywords: Failure mode and effects analysis, Root cause analysis, Random safety auditing

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0095-5108(10)00009-6

doi:10.1016/j.clp.2010.01.008

Clinics in Perinatology
Volume 37, Issue 1 , Pages 141-165, March 2010