HomeClinics HomeAbout ClinicsAll ClinicsHot TopicsAdvancesSpecial OffersCME
Logo
Search for

Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 309-323 (June 2008)


View previous. 5 of 15 View next.

The Relationship Between Cesarean Delivery and Gestational Age Among US Singleton Births

Vani R. Bettegowda, MHSaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Todd Dias, MSa, Michael J. Davidoff, MPHa, Karla Damus, RN, PhDb, William M. Callaghan, MD, MPHc, Joann R. Petrini, PhD, MPHab

The increasing trend of delivering at earlier gestational ages has raised concerns of the impact on maternal and infant health. The delicate balance of the risks and benefits associated with continuing a pregnancy versus delivering early remains challenging. Among singleton live births in the United States, the proportion of preterm births increased from 9.7% to 10.7% between 1996 and 2004. The increase in singleton preterm births occurred primarily among those delivered by cesarean section, with the largest percentage increase in late preterm births. For all maternal racial/ethnic groups, singleton cesarean section rates increased for each gestational age group. Singleton cesarean section rates for non-Hispanic black women increased at a faster pace among all preterm gestational age groups compared with non-Hispanic white and Hispanic women. Further research is needed to understand the underlying reasons for the increase in cesarean section deliveries resulting in preterm birth.

a Perinatal Data Center, National Office, March of Dimes Foundation, 1275 Mamaroneck Avenue, White Plains, NY 10605, USA

b Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA

c Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, MS K-23, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

 The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the respective agencies.

PII: S0095-5108(08)00017-1

doi:10.1016/j.clp.2008.03.002


View previous. 5 of 15 View next.